Well, we can add another layer of EDiocy to his credit.
Late last week, his neighbor on the third floor, in the unit adjacent to his, had all her windows replaced!
Ironically, what was the first thing the workers removed when demolishing the old windows?
The screens...which were intact and undamaged!
The Board member was obviously aware of the window replacement, since he had to vote to approve the financial allocation to pay for it.
So, why didn't he simply wait until his neighbor's windows were replaced, then use the discarded screens to replace his damaged screens?
It would've saved any and all repair costs, much less the extra charges imposed for climbing three stories, removing the screens, repairing them, then climbing three stories again to re-install them!
And then he has the gall to demand $10,000 for unneeded "security cameras"? Subscribers will read the details on the daily uncensored feed tomorrow.
Want to subscribe? Send a request to claremontwhistleblower at gmailpants.com, change "at" to "@" and take off "pants". (We do this to avoid spammers and EDiots.)
